How it worksFeaturesIndustriesPricingSign in
For manufacturing & supply chain teams

One bad call echoes down the line.

Manufacturing decisions ripple: the supplier you commit to, the line you retool, the buffer you cut. Wavn argues those calls against their second-order effects with three minds, and keeps the reasoning your future self will audit.

Supply chains fail at decision boundaries: the single-source deal that looked efficient, the inventory buffer that got optimized away, the retooling call made on a vendor's timeline. Each was locally reasonable and nobody argued the system-level consequence. Wavn is where that argument happens, three minds stress the call against lead times, failure modes, and the scenario nobody wants to model, and the reasoning is kept, so the next disruption is met with a record instead of an archaeology project.

The decisions you live with

Where the cost of getting it wrong is real.

Single-source or resilience

Taking the better unit price against the concentration risk that shows up only when it's too late to fix.

The retooling window

Committing the line to a changeover when the demand forecast is soft and downtime is measured in money per hour.

Where the buffer lives

Deciding which inventory to hold and where, when finance wants it lean and operations remembers the last stockout.

Make, buy, or move

Choosing what to produce in-house, what to outsource, and when to relocate production, decisions with decade-long shadows.

How Wavn fits the work

Your workflow, with the thinking kept.

The disruption scenario, argued

Debate

The minds stress the supplier decision against the port closure, the tariff, the quality failure, before the contract is signed.

System effects made visible

Converge

Converge maps where the options agree and where the real trade-off sits, unit cost against resilience, named explicitly instead of averaged away.

Calls your successor can audit

Decide

Lock the sourcing or capacity decision with its assumptions and dissent. Three years on, the reasoning is a search away, not retired with its maker.

Reviews that fire themselves

Schedule

Contract renewals, capacity reviews, and revisit dates land on the Schedule; the single-source decision re-argues itself when the review comes due.

The board-ready case

Deliverables

The capex case, the sourcing comparison, the risk one-pager, generated from the locked decision with the reasoning inside.

See it work

One manufacturing & supply chain project, walked live.

This is The single-source deal, stage by stage. Click any step on the line and the screen follows.

The single-source deal · Argued
ShareJourney
Consolidate to one supplier for 18% savings, or keep two?
Wave · asked all 3 minds · Debate
Claude
18% assumes zero disruption for three years. Price one six-week stoppage and the saving halves.
Gemini
The supplier's region logged two port disruptions in the last eighteen months.
Cohere
The plant manager's bad feeling is data from the last stoppage. Put it on the record as a scenario.
Converge2 agree · 1 contested
Agreed
The savings assume zero disruption
The region has a disruption history
Contested
The true cost of qualifying a second source
Unsupported
Flagged claims, named out loud

Three minds take positions and argue them properly. Converge maps the real shape.

The Guide

Deciding is half the work. Wavn walks the rest.

A thought caught on your phone becomes a project. Three minds argue it, the call is locked with its dissent, and then the road opens: the accounts you'll need in plain words, a spec in one click, documents and decks and spreadsheets generated from the decision, Claude connected to build the real thing, and the launch on a Schedule that briefs you before every date. The Journey report can replay all of it, months later, when someone asks why.

IdeaArguedDecided4Set up5Spec6Built7Scheduled
Illustrative scenario

A mid-size industrial manufacturer

Manufacturing · Plants in the US and Mexico

Procurement can cut component cost 18% by consolidating to a single overseas supplier. Finance loves it. The plant manager remembers the last time a single source went dark for six weeks, but 'I have a bad feeling' isn't an argument that survives a spreadsheet.

In Wavn
  • 01The consolidation case and the plant manager's objection go on a canvas as equals.
  • 02The minds argue it: Debate prices the disruption scenarios the spreadsheet ignored, and Converge shows the 18% saving assumes zero disruption over three years.
  • 03The team locks a split-source decision, 70/30 with a qualified second supplier, dissent from finance kept, revisit set at 12 months.
  • 04The board one-pager generates from the decision; the supplier qualification milestones land on the Schedule.
The outcome

Eight months in, the primary supplier hit a two-week stoppage, and the second source absorbed it without a line-down day. The revisit re-ran the numbers with real data, and the 'bad feeling' was now a documented, vindicated decision the whole company could learn from.

This scenario is illustrative, a composite of how manufacturing & supply chain teams work, not a named client. Wavn is invite-only and we don't publish customer names without permission.

Wavn doesn't run your MRP or forecast your demand. It makes sure the decisions that echo down the line were argued against their consequences, and keeps the reasoning where the next crisis can find it.

Bring it to your manufacturing & supply chain team.

Wavn is invite-only while we grow it carefully. Walk the road and see it for yourself.